****GAY SEX**** with Uncle Albert

UA's not gay.


But his boyfriend is.

So.. then there should be no problem, because his employer must allow him to browse wherever he wants... so why worry about the title of a thread?

Ya'd think, wouldn't you?

Maybe UA should find employment at a company that doesn't have an issue with gay sex. Why are we letting UA's employer essentially decide what is and isn't acceptable at Wordforge? I have zero sympathy for someone who gets in trouble for browsing the Red Room at work (so long as it wasn't something like porn posted by someone else).

Worst idea for a public access talk show ever.

Tell UA to check his entitlement at the door of the Red Room.

Hey, what happened to that feature where we could have threads by selected members filtered out? Ya know, back when Starturd and Baba were spamming the RR like crazy a couple years ago. I went to boot camp that same time, so I dunno if it ever got implemented or not, but this seems like a pretty good use for that feature.

That, and ignoring the little shit, so it' not as fun for him to fuck over everyone.

It still works, I'm not bothered with the baba's verbal diarrhea anymore thanks to ignore!

I'm kinda getting a laugh out of it

I think putting me on Ignore should keep my threads from showing up, but then again I haven't used Ignore in ages so it might be different.

Weird... Just tested it out, and for me it just shows the ignored user's name but no thread title, with the words "thread deleted" in the columns that track replies and views. Are you viewing it in the forum or in the Unread Posts section? I think it might be a different case in there.

Yeah, there's nothing I can do about the "unread posts" view.

But don't let that interfere with your douchebaggery. I'm sure your momma is real proud.

Aah, wonder why that is.

Yeah, she's sending me congratulatory flowers for this thread.

I agree.


It should be shown where more people can watch it.

The fighting and kicking and rage would be a ratings extravaganza.

If UA's employer was dictating anything you would have been warned or banned and the shit removed.

Whether it's removed or not, or a rule or not, it's a fucking dick move, period.

Those gifs in your signature are fucking annoying too. Thanks for the headache, jerk.

Seriously? Warnings are handed out based on employers of member's "rules"?

Well let me tell you about my employer...

If we weren't warning for large flashing swastika images that also accused me (by my first name) of pedophilia, then I hardly think referencing "gay sex" is warnable, even if it's tied to a members username.

Besides, how many references to hetero sex do we have around here without anyone blinking an eye?

Gay sex is immoral, whereas many here are married.

I will say that the out of sex hetero stuff is wrong as well.

So apostle has now chimed in three times about how immoral gay sex is? In a thread called "gay sex with Uncle Albert?"

apostle, you're a queer. Own it. Love it. Be it. We love you no matter what. The only people who wouldn't are people like...you know, you.

Well you showed me. I'll never have gay sex with Uncle Albert.

Not any more headache-inducing than half the crap posted here on a daily basis. Don't be jealous of Hill-dog.

This is precisely the issue. We have one thread specifically about gay sex and suddenly UA gets his panties in a bunch, compared to how many about straight sex? He then bullies the thread poster into changing the thread title by raising a stink about it, just because he might get in trouble at work. As I said before, don't let members' employers dictate what can and cannot fly in the Red Room.

Can't you read?

Of course they are not which is why I said IF.

Yes...you said if UA's employer said they didn't like Timmy's thread title you would warn/ban him and remove his "shit".

I read it.

Your turn.

Probably just like whatever you're already used to. Now STFU and go leap into a furnace.

A lawyer should understand the difference between "saying they don't like it" and "dictating how things are to be done on WF."

Are you really going to pretend you don't see the difference?

You're gay.

Nope. You guys can have him. We don't want him.

And in a few months, accepted by neither camp, he'll go around claiming to be asexual.