How come the U.S. never converted over to the Metric System

Discussion in 'The Red Room' started by Starguard, Apr 22, 2009.

  1. Starguard

    Starguard Fresh Meat

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2006
    Messages:
    7,402
    Location:
    Midwest
    Ratings:
    +766
    I think we are the only country left on earth that hasn't (well.. not completely anyways)!

    :spaceturk:
  2. Azure

    Azure I could kick your ass

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2007
    Messages:
    12,008
    Ratings:
    +4,417
    Because you can't build a house with metric.
  3. Starguard

    Starguard Fresh Meat

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2006
    Messages:
    7,402
    Location:
    Midwest
    Ratings:
    +766
    The Europeans did it!
  4. Nautica

    Nautica Probably a Dual

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2005
    Messages:
    11,555
    Location:
    St. Louis
    Ratings:
    +6,507
    I think Myanmar is also still not on metric... :shrug:
  5. bryce

    bryce Optimism - It's Back!

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2007
    Messages:
    7,519
    Location:
    Space, The Final Frontier
    Ratings:
    +3,130
    We didn't want foreign rulers...
    • Agree Agree x 5
  6. Captain X

    Captain X Responsible cookie control

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Messages:
    15,318
    Location:
    The Land of Snow and Cold
    Ratings:
    +9,742
    Because when your entire country is divided up into 1 square mile sections, it's kind of pointless.
  7. Midnight Funeral

    Midnight Funeral Cúchulainn

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2004
    Messages:
    8,622
    Location:
    Portadown, North Armagh
    Ratings:
    +1,694
    Phallic measurements.

    A penis measured in centimeters just sounds wrong.
  8. enlisted person

    enlisted person Black Swan

    Joined:
    May 15, 2004
    Messages:
    20,859
    Ratings:
    +3,635
  9. enlisted person

    enlisted person Black Swan

    Joined:
    May 15, 2004
    Messages:
    20,859
    Ratings:
    +3,635
    Its because we are OK with fractions and know how to use them. Those who can't, use metric because you don't have to think and they want to be lazy.
  10. Paladin

    Paladin Overjoyed Man of Liberty

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    51,053
    Location:
    Spacetime
    Ratings:
    +54,738
    Regarding the metric system, we should adopt it to ward off future hazards in the scientific fields.

    After all, an ounce of prevention is worth 453.6 grams of cure (on the Earth's surface, at least).
  11. Nightbird

    Nightbird Goth, Witch, and Dreamer

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2004
    Messages:
    866
    Location:
    In a gypsy wagon
    Ratings:
    +265
    Fuck the Metric System ! I like what we have and metric just sucks.
  12. 14thDoctor

    14thDoctor Oi

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2007
    Messages:
    32,610
    Ratings:
    +52,902
    Personal experience?


    :itsokay:
  13. Dan Leach

    Dan Leach Climbing Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    32,367
    Location:
    Lancaster UK
    Ratings:
    +10,683
    Thats a little unfair. Metric makes more sense and the units are much more interchangeable. 1 litre of water for example weighs exactly 1 kilo
  14. Captain X

    Captain X Responsible cookie control

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Messages:
    15,318
    Location:
    The Land of Snow and Cold
    Ratings:
    +9,742
    Whatever you're used to makes the most sense. If you were brought up with the Imperial system, its units and conversions come as easily as metric does for someone raised with that system. As an engineering student in the US, I can use both with relative ease.
  15. Dan Leach

    Dan Leach Climbing Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    32,367
    Location:
    Lancaster UK
    Ratings:
    +10,683
    The problem is 'what you're used to' might be total pants. No matter how you feel about it.
    Our system up 'til 1971 was like this
    A stupid system that was stupidly complicated. There was a great deal of opposition to going to decimal (100 pence=1 pound) because people thought it was 'too complicated'.
  16. Asyncritus

    Asyncritus Expert on everything

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2004
    Messages:
    21,680
    Location:
    Stuck at home most of the time. :(
    Ratings:
    +24,234
    Not true. How many people do you know who can easily tell you how many pounds of water in a cubic foot? Or how much a gallon of water weighs? Or how many gallons there are in a cubic yard?

    Not to mention that the British and the Americans can't even agree on how much liquid is contained in a gallon.

    There is nothing rational about the Imperial system. Those who pretend it is as easy to use as the metric system simply show their profound ignorance of the metric system.


    • Agree Agree x 3
  17. Clyde

    Clyde Orange

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    25,971
    Ratings:
    +8,374
    The metric system does seem a superior means of measurement but I can't think of a good enough reason for us everyday US folks to switch to the metric system. Sure the uniformity has its appeal, but it's not that big a deal.

    Wouldn't mind if everyone spoke the same language either but I'm not rushing out to learn Esperanto.

    :clyde:

    Whoever came up with the metric system missed an easy means to insure smooth conversion from standard measurement, they should've made a kilometer equal to a mile. Would've been a done deal. Instead the base metric unit is one-fiftieth of the distance from the equator to either pole. Yeah, way to pull that one out of your ass.

    Oh and why hasn't the metric world switched to metric time?
  18. Asyncritus

    Asyncritus Expert on everything

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2004
    Messages:
    21,680
    Location:
    Stuck at home most of the time. :(
    Ratings:
    +24,234
    You're closer to it than you realize. English is the simplest major language in the world, and it is the most widely used language. It is thus the closest analogy to the metric system for measurement.

    Are you sure? Because the original metric system was based on a mile (a nautical mile, one minute of arc of a great circle of the Earth). That didn't help to get it accepted. It was a long time before the metric system was accepted internationally, and only when its base unit was something other than a nautical mile.

    Actually it's one ten-millionth, a decimal subdivision.

    It makes more sense when the figure is right (1/10,000,000 instead of 1/50).

    Because there is no need to have easy conversions from units of time to units of mass, volume or length. A decimal system would be nicer, but not enough nicer to make the changeover worthwhile. The advantages of the metric system for mass, length and volume, however, are great enough that scientists everywhere have made the change. Even in the U.S.


  19. enlisted person

    enlisted person Black Swan

    Joined:
    May 15, 2004
    Messages:
    20,859
    Ratings:
    +3,635
    Yes but it served a great purpose having 240 pence to the pound. The point was the divisibility of the coinage. You can dvide 240 a lot more ways than 100, you can devide 120 a lot more ways than 50, and so on. 20 can be divided by 20, 10, 5, 4, 2,1. It was just more handy fractionally when a pound was worth a whole lot. In the US past we used Spanish dollars that could be split in 8ths called bits because of its breakdown fractionally.
  20. Clyde

    Clyde Orange

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    25,971
    Ratings:
    +8,374
    Actually it would be more analoguos to standard measurement. A chaotic means of communication that would be adopted solely based on popularity.

    If a kilometer were equal to a mile the US would already be metric. In my opinion, distance is the toughest measure to grasp. Nobody minds buying soda by the liter, cocaine by the gram and our light bulbs are already measured in kilowatts but a kilometer? There is just no easy frame of reference.

    Ah, the 1/50 was the figure Eratosthenes used to determined the Earth's circumference.

    Exactly my point regarding us everyday US folk not converting to metric.


    Metric time is too difficult or not worthwhile enough to scientists? 60 seconds in a minute, 60 minutes in an hour, 24 hours in a day, 7 days in a week, a random number of days in a month and 12 months in a year is the superior chronology?

    And that's not even addressing the whole "before Christ" and "anno domini" means of recording history. Though I will give the scientists credit in that regard, instead making up some new calendar nobody would care about they simply switched B.C. to B.C.E (before the common era) which makes the transition between the terms effortless, much like if the kilometer had been designated the same length as a mile.

    I'd say it is more likely, that the regular folks in metric countries don't consider switching to metric time worth it. And I can't say as I blame them.
  21. enlisted person

    enlisted person Black Swan

    Joined:
    May 15, 2004
    Messages:
    20,859
    Ratings:
    +3,635
    They still use the nautical mile at sea because if works out so well with time, they don't use Kilometers, its still knots (nautical miles per hour). If we only had 4 fingers and 4 toes, people would be pushing for the Octal system. Think about it, people want base ten because people have 10 fingers. Thats really fucked when you think about it.
  22. Patch

    Patch Version 2.7

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2006
    Messages:
    3,450
    Ratings:
    +904
    Personally, I prefer the 13 month year. 13 months at 28 days= 364 days. The leftover day could be a global holiday to celebrate what makes our individual cultures so grand. The US could have fireworks and barbecues, it'd be awesome.
    • Agree Agree x 2
  23. Scott Hamilton Robert E Ron Paul Lee

    Scott Hamilton Robert E Ron Paul Lee Straight Awesome

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2008
    Messages:
    29,016
    Location:
    TN
    Ratings:
    +14,153
    The only place I ever see Kilometer's used in the US is when you get close to UN bio whatchamacallits, like in the smokey mountains. They have distances in miles, and kilo's.

    THANKS BILL CLINTON. :ua:
  24. Captain J

    Captain J 16" Gunner

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2004
    Messages:
    11,019
    Location:
    Taking a dump
    Ratings:
    +5,148
    One of our Mars probes crashed because half of it was calculated using metric and the other half imperial. Oops. :bang: Standardization is good.
  25. Dan Leach

    Dan Leach Climbing Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    32,367
    Location:
    Lancaster UK
    Ratings:
    +10,683
    Sounds like China + Australia :)
  26. Patch

    Patch Version 2.7

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2006
    Messages:
    3,450
    Ratings:
    +904
    A testament to the diversity of our culture. :)
  27. Uncle Albert

    Uncle Albert Part beard. Part machine.

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    65,601
    Location:
    'twixt my nethers
    Ratings:
    +30,943
    Because we don't like being told what to fucking do.

    :finger:
  28. RickDeckard

    RickDeckard Socialist

    Joined:
    May 28, 2004
    Messages:
    40,081
    Location:
    Ireland
    Ratings:
    +37,805
    Perhaps the rest of us should try demanding that the US adopt a more militaristic, more abrasive foreign policy in future...
  29. oldfella1962

    oldfella1962 the only real finish line

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2004
    Messages:
    81,024
    Location:
    front and center
    Ratings:
    +30,008
    When I was about 10 years old we had a teacher who said "get ready for the metric system! America will be metric by 1975." :jayzus:

    We still haven't gone metric, and she's long gone and 182.88 cm under! ;)
    • Agree Agree x 2
  30. Captain X

    Captain X Responsible cookie control

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Messages:
    15,318
    Location:
    The Land of Snow and Cold
    Ratings:
    +9,742
    And I'm easily able to use both, hurray me. :shrug: I tend to use metric in engineering or scientific calculations and convert back to Imperial if I have to, but in everyday life I prefer Imperial because it's much easier to visualize.