So now that regime goons are executing citizens for legally owning guns, is it finally time for the second amendment voting-from-the-rooftops crowd to join the good cause? Yeah, didn’t think so, either.
What we need to understand is that when Paladin is requesting another angle, it's because he's still a bit sore from the last time he bent over for these fuckers.
The New York Fucking Times has even been forced to admit it. https://removepaywalls.com/https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/24/opinion/state-terror-has-arrived.html
Every time I see someone post something from bluesky I can't help but laugh. It's like the left took their ball and went home. Lol.
Every time I see you post, I can't help but laugh. Funny to watch the delusion of someone who is clearly going to Hell.
I don't do TikTok but this angle of the shooting clearly shows an ICE goon running away from the scrum with what ICE later claimed was Pretti's gun (two-tone finish with a holosight) in his hand before the first shot is fired. https://www.facebook.com/1380933702/videos/1918585922077717/
If you want law enforcement, and I use that term loosely with these ICE Brownshirts, to have absolute immunity you’ve drifted so far from the meaning of the Constitution it’s pointless to try to bring you back.
I am waiting with baited breath for UA to continue to contort himself to support ICE. I am losing flexibility in my old age and want to get some tips.
UA and FF are waiting on instructions from their Youtubers, but their Youtubers are passed out from cumming so hard.
Paladin is a second amendment wingnut with a small armory at home. He often talks about self-defense and freedom from tyranny. I suspect he's too busy masturbating to all this, rather than following his supposed principles.
And what is happening inside ICE detention centers? 404 Media also learned that the federal government claimed that the day after it was sued for allegedly abusing detainees at an ICE detention center, a “system crash” deleted nearly two weeks of surveillance footage from inside the facility. https://www.404media.co/ice-says-cr...lost-in-system-crash-a-day-after-it-was-sued/
Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O'Hara: "People have had enough. This is the third shooting in less than 3 weeks. The MPD went the entire year last year recovering about 900 guns from the street, arresting hundreds of violent offenders, and we didn't shoot anyone ... this is not sustainable." https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3mdb3bqcdgg2o
That's it My Minnesota relatives are really mad. Thier posts have words like b*stard and friggen on Facebook. Asterisk included.
WaPo has stabilized and slowed down video clearly showing that the victim never reached for his weapon and that he had been disarmed before his execution. https://bsky.app/profile/dieworkwear.bsky.social/post/3mdbdded2v22g @Paladin
@Paladin will need 20 more angles of video footage before he can reach his already made conclusion that this killing was justified.
Simply that Pretti was armed is not indicative of any crime. He, like every other non-disqualified American has, had every right to be. However, when one is going about armed, one should exercise discretion and not insert oneself into situations where conflict is foreseeable. One certainly shouldn't engage in confrontation with law enforcement officers. I don't see any evidence that Pretti used or intended to use his gun against officers before the melee began. I can't say one way or the other if he made any attempt to grab for it during the fracas, but I don't see any evidence that he did. One agent has taken Pretti's gun before shots ensue. While one might say "he's been disarmed, so no need for further violence," one could also say "a subject resisting arrest is found to be armed." It's unclear to me if any of the other agents apart from the one holding it saw the gun, or saw it being removed. There are shouts of "Gun! Gun! Gun!" immediately before one agent is seen reacting suddenly and drawing his own gun. If the agent who drew is the one who fired, he almost certainly heard the "Gun!" warning, but may not have seen that the gun had been removed. With a subject resisting officers and there being a gun present, any movement that looked like an attempt to draw would've motivated a shot. There's a shot, a very brief pause and then three more shots, then another brief pause, and several more shots are fired, and it sounds like two different guns firing at the same time, though I'm not sure. So, shooting justified? It depends on what the agent who fired first knew and saw. For the shooting to be justified, the agent would have to reasonably believe there was a threat present. The agent does not have to be correct, only reasonable given the circumstances. If there's bodycam footage, that will be more enlightening
