I’m not the others here. There’s no need to go to radical extremes. No, offense is not injury. Also, injury is not nothing. If free expression means lying, cheating, instigating violence, and disseminating propaganda, then yes, it absolutely should be curtailed.
So being asked to refer to people the way they'd prefer because it's polite doesn't actually hurt you at all?
That absolutely is where it started. Men insisting on being men. And boys must be men. And women must be women. And all women rolled all their eyes but still pat men on the heads and say “yes, you are a man”. And now men are over reacting to the same. Just remember men, when women want pink shit, cry about over your manly soap.
Hey fellas, is it manly to have a long, hard, slippery, corrugated piece of black soap made to be gripped at one end and slipped into something at the other?
How about if we call them human beings? If you want to get more precise, we could also call them human beings to whom we have decided to deny the opportunity that our ancestors had, provided that "we" are people whose ancestors came from western and northern Europe.
Ironically, you know the best way to boost America's production economy? Abundant, cheap labor. I wonder where we find that...
It is kind of funny when you pare it down. Our ancestors showed up to a land filled with indigenous people and we basically said "God said we could have this land," and then we just kind of took it by hook or by crook, and now people want to show up, work as a part of this society, and so many of us shove them away asking them what right they think they have to just show up.
I've done a lot of research into my mom's side of the family, all of whom arrived here in roughly the last quarter of the 19th century. Her mother's family was 100% Norwegian, and her father's was 100% German. Their motives and characteristics were strikingly similar to those of immigrants today. What's different is the level of opportunity the people who arrived previously chose to offer them. The biggest reason they came was economic opportunity, which is why I have to laugh when anybody says today's immigrants are "economic migrants" as if that's a bad thing. A second motivation, on the German side, was fear of being drafted into the Prussian army. Conservatives love to bitch about people speaking languages other than English, but the first generation of my ancestors to come here lived in German and Norwegian enclaves in North Dakota and continued speaking their native languages for their entire lives. I have some of their obituaries, which were published in Norwegian in a Norwegian-language newspaper that served the Norwegian-speaking community. However, when they arrived, there were no quotas, no barriers, and no hoops to jump through. All they had to do was get on a boat, show up at the Port of Detroit, and if I remember correctly, take a blood test to prove they didn't have syphilis. They didn't need a green card or a special visa. They just showed up and started farming. Four or five years later, they signed a document forswearing any allegiance to the king of their native country, and just like that, they were citizens. The difference? They were white.
Is that a beaver? Damn, even they're sick of our shit! ...can they at least wait til the end of college football before fucking off from Corvallis to Beaverstan?
everything you don't like is "coercion"... especially if it's about your being a dick not being welcomed in say a place of business or a public service.
No idea where you get those fantasies. I wouldn't challenge a business owner's right to set the rules for their establishment, and if "public" is meant to say "tax funded," it must be politically neutral and secular.
you realize "neutral and secular" means you're not allowed to parade your bigotry all over the place and there's potential consequences for when you do? it doesn't mean your personalized interpretation of "law of the jungle".
No, it does not preclude free expression, and no, refusal to placate and pander is not bigotry. Because you say so? Get fucked.
“Public” in this case, means, anyone at any time can enter the establishment. You know this. If someone decides to open a business, then that business is open to the public. Period. After s/he opens the doors, he has zero say in who gets to enter or buy. If he does, he is committing a fucking crime. So, now s/he is an illegal business owner.
Not unconditionally. Not if it's private property. False. It is open when and to whom the owner sees fit. This is just incorrect. The owner reserves the right to refuse service to anyone at any time.
If someone wants to sell shit to only certain people, that person can crawl up their own ass with a copy of the bill of rights including all amendments including the one stating public business cannot discriminate.