The 2025 Omnibus Political Memes Thread

Discussion in 'The Red Room' started by We Are Borg, Dec 31, 2024.

  1. Tuckerfan

    Tuckerfan BMF

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    100,677
    Location:
    Can't tell you, 'cause I'm undercover!
    Ratings:
    +211,392
    IMG_4245.jpeg
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • popcorn popcorn x 1
  2. Tuckerfan

    Tuckerfan BMF

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    100,677
    Location:
    Can't tell you, 'cause I'm undercover!
    Ratings:
    +211,392
    IMG_4246.jpeg
    • Funny Funny x 2
  3. Tuckerfan

    Tuckerfan BMF

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    100,677
    Location:
    Can't tell you, 'cause I'm undercover!
    Ratings:
    +211,392
    IMG_4248.jpeg
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Winner Winner x 2
  4. Tuckerfan

    Tuckerfan BMF

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    100,677
    Location:
    Can't tell you, 'cause I'm undercover!
    Ratings:
    +211,392
    IMG_4251.jpeg
    • Agree Agree x 2
  5. Kommander

    Kommander I for one welcome our new myconid overlords

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2010
    Messages:
    4,563
    Location:
    Gay Sex Command Center
    Ratings:
    +11,138
    Grey Poupon is like $4, whereas store-brand yellow mustard is like $2. What kind of dipshit describes someone spending an extra $2 on mustard as "infuriating?" Also, if your finances are so fucked that you can't spend an extra $2 on something you want, you've got bigger problems than what people are doing with their SNAP benefits.

    Even if every SNAP recipient was buying Grey Poupon, it wouldn't be a big deal, and anyone who says otherwise is stupid and and asshole. But every SNAP recipient isn't buying Grey Poupon. If they buy mustard at all, most are buying cheap yellow mustard, because most people like cheap yellow mustard.

    It's not that they do, it's that it's theoretically possible. There's a reason SNAP is they way it is: because it's A HELL OF A LOT MORE COST EFFECTIVE to use the existing food distribution system that everyone uses than to create a separate one just for free food for poor people. "Here's a card, go grocery shopping like a normal person" as opposed to "here's a completely separate logistical network JUST FOR POOR PEOPLE, but you don't deserve it, so to punish you for it, WE get to choose what you eat."

    Micro-managers everywhere need to get fucked. I'm not poor because I need micro-management, I'm poor because I'm surrounded by people who insist I need mirco-management. How the fuck am I supposed to get anything done when I have to constantly stop and explain myself because I can't apparently be trusted to make a single decision about anything ever?
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Winner Winner x 1
  6. tafkats

    tafkats vagina filled dick balloon Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Messages:
    27,365
    Location:
    Sunnydale
    Ratings:
    +61,785
    In fact, if the $2 difference really is too much for you to afford, you probably should be eligible for SNAP.

    But if the poors can use the same grocery stores as everyone else, how will we know who to look down on? How will we make sure they stay in their place?
    • Agree Agree x 4
  7. Kommander

    Kommander I for one welcome our new myconid overlords

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2010
    Messages:
    4,563
    Location:
    Gay Sex Command Center
    Ratings:
    +11,138
    By doing it overtly instead of making excuses. Want to put "the lessers" in their place? Then do so. Whining about how unfair it is that they don't put themselves in their place is for the weak.

    Now that I think about it, most of the "punishment" I've endured thought my life wasn't actually punishment: it's people telling me I deserve punishment and insisting I'm a bad person if I don't punish myself. What a bunch of lazy bullshit.
    • Agree Agree x 1