US-Russia Missile Talks Come To Naught

Discussion in 'The Red Room' started by phantomofthenet, Oct 12, 2007.

  1. phantomofthenet

    phantomofthenet Locked By Request

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2004
    Messages:
    19,287
    Location:
    :mystery:
    Ratings:
    +2,902
    MOSCOW - Russian President Vladimir Putin warned President Bush's top two Cabinet officials on Friday to back off U.S. missile defense plans for eastern Europe as high-level talks yielded little more than a pledge to meet again.

    Despite presenting new cooperation proposals intended to bring Moscow on board, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Defense Secretary Robert Gates failed in a series of tough meetings to turn around Moscow's opposition to the system and other strategic issues.

    Putin set the tone early on when he hosted Rice and Gates and their Russian counterparts at his country home outside Moscow and delivered a stern rebuff to U.S. plans to push ahead with establishing missile defense facilities in Poland and the Czech Republic.

    In combative comments that took the U.S. side aback during a photo session, Putin criticized Bush's pet project and threatened to pull out of a Cold War-era treaty that limits intermediate-range missiles.

    Would You Like To Know More?

    Just gets better and better for the State Department, doesn't it?
  2. Dayton Kitchens

    Dayton Kitchens Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2004
    Messages:
    51,920
    Location:
    Norphlet, Arkansas
    Ratings:
    +5,414
    Why should the Russians care if we deploy ABMs or not?

    After sixty years, they should know we aren't going to attack them.
  3. phantomofthenet

    phantomofthenet Locked By Request

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2004
    Messages:
    19,287
    Location:
    :mystery:
    Ratings:
    +2,902
    I think the problem is a perception of American aggressiveness coupled with a Russian inferiority complex.

    I wouldn't be surprised if the Russians want to be a superpower again and start to assert themselves more...if only because they can. :shrug:
  4. marathon

    marathon Calm Down, Europe...

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    28,685
    Location:
    Midamerica
    Ratings:
    +3,593
    I still think it should boil down to Poland and the Czech Republic. If they want them, put them there. If they don't, no.
    • Agree Agree x 2
  5. RickDeckard

    RickDeckard Socialist

    Joined:
    May 28, 2004
    Messages:
    38,771
    Location:
    Ireland
    Ratings:
    +34,113
    Putin is right. Like a broken clock, I suppose.
  6. Elwood

    Elwood I know what I'm about, son.

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2004
    Messages:
    30,008
    Location:
    Unknown, but I know how fast I'm going.
    Ratings:
    +25,066
    But they can't, outside of nuclear weapons. Their Army is in shambles and their Navy couldn't surge if it had to. I hear their Air Force is in the best shape out of the bunch, but they don't have much. Of course, they could flex their economic might...oh...wait.

    :marathon:
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. Caedus

    Caedus Fresh Meat Formerly Deceased Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2006
    Messages:
    3,813
    Ratings:
    +1,554
    Fuck Putin.

    Someone who seems to be doing to damnedest to make sure that no one can stop the crazy towlies in Iran from getting nukes shouldn't keep his neighbors from asking for foreign help for a defense system in case said Islamocrazies ever try to fire off a few missiles into Eurabia.
  8. Dan Leach

    Dan Leach Climbing Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    32,367
    Location:
    Lancaster UK
    Ratings:
    +10,677
    Both sides acting like dicks. The 'missile shield' is obviously intended to piss of Russia as much as possible and the Russians are using it as much as possible as an excuse for belligerence.
    Its like watching 7 yr old boys arguing in a sand pit...
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. Chris

    Chris Cosmic Horror

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2004
    Messages:
    28,946
    Ratings:
    +4,331
    No it's not.

    It can't possibly deflect the ICBMs the Russians are fielding, and any launch from Iran at Europe would come right near Poland and the Czech Republic.

    Russia's a whiner and you're a tool. Big surprise. :rolleyes:
  10. evenflow

    evenflow Lofty Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Messages:
    25,051
    Location:
    Where the skies are not cloudy all day
    Ratings:
    +20,615
    Either Poland and Czech Republic are free of the shackles of the 20th century or they're not.
    • Agree Agree x 2
  11. marathon

    marathon Calm Down, Europe...

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    28,685
    Location:
    Midamerica
    Ratings:
    +3,593
    Can't exactly expect them to have the mindset of the part of Europe that has been free since WWII when they can still feel Russia's hot breath on their neck. They should coat the missiles with binaca :soma:
    • Agree Agree x 1
  12. oldfella1962

    oldfella1962 the only real finish line

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2004
    Messages:
    81,024
    Location:
    front and center
    Ratings:
    +29,960
    I worked with the Polish Air Force a couple of times. They fly old school MIGS and whatnot, :cool: but they were in good shape.
    They use AK-47 and I got to shoot one - I could get used to that!

    We had cookouts with them and they made us potato pancakes, sausages and locally brewed beer! They told us to drink the beer fast, or it would go bad. I had a few sitting around in my wall-locker at the office I had forgot about a month after we got back to Germany. I drank one and
    WHOA that shit was rancid! :lol:
  13. Paladin

    Paladin Overjoyed Man of Liberty

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    50,154
    Location:
    Spacetime
    Ratings:
    +53,512
    Putin's full of shit. The ABM system in no way negates Russia's nuclear arsenal (until we build several thousand interceptors, that is), it just sends a message to Iran: even if you build missiles, you won't be able to blackmail us or Europe with them.
    • Agree Agree x 2
  14. Elwood

    Elwood I know what I'm about, son.

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2004
    Messages:
    30,008
    Location:
    Unknown, but I know how fast I'm going.
    Ratings:
    +25,066
    Let the Europeans develop their own missile defense system. They should be able to get it through the various EU commissions by 2376.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. Dayton Kitchens

    Dayton Kitchens Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2004
    Messages:
    51,920
    Location:
    Norphlet, Arkansas
    Ratings:
    +5,414
    I think a couple of things drives this.

    First.

    1) If ABMs can intercept 10 missiles, then an expanded system could intercept 1000. It is just a matter of scale. If a small system proves highly successful then a larger one can as well.

    2) Putin knows that one way or another the Russian nuclear arsenal is going to fade away unless their economy improves dramatically. I read in Foreign Affairs that within 10 years some 30% of Russian nuclear weapons will become operationally unreliable due to age.

    Foreign Affairs also noted that right now the U.S. could take out almost all of the Russian arsenal with a first strike thanks to huge gaps in the Russian radar coverage.
  16. Chris

    Chris Cosmic Horror

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2004
    Messages:
    28,946
    Ratings:
    +4,331
    ^It's not a matter of hitting the missiles, we can do that already. It's the multiple warheads, and the fake warheads.

    Becomes too expensive.
  17. Elwood

    Elwood I know what I'm about, son.

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2004
    Messages:
    30,008
    Location:
    Unknown, but I know how fast I'm going.
    Ratings:
    +25,066
    Much easier to hit them during the boost phase, no?

    Where would be a good spot to put a system that could destroy Russia's land-based ICBMs during their boost phase? :diacanu:
  18. BearTM

    BearTM Bustin' a move! Deceased Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Messages:
    27,833
    Ratings:
    +5,276
    In orbit.
  19. Paladin

    Paladin Overjoyed Man of Liberty

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    50,154
    Location:
    Spacetime
    Ratings:
    +53,512
    No doubt. But to intercept 1000, you've probably got to have 2000 interceptors, and they ain't cheap. The Russians would have YEARS of warning before that many interceptors could be fielded.
    True. And then much of Russia's remaining influence in Europe and Asia dwindles. The only thing they've got going for themselves now is oil.

    Putin probably realizes that Russia is fucked no matter what. If he lets the ABM go forward, Russia looks weak. If he reacts rashly to it, he'll drive capital from his country and the economy will get worse.

    My guess? Ivan's going to bend over and take it.
    I wouldn't doubt it. But we don't really have a reason to.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  20. RickDeckard

    RickDeckard Socialist

    Joined:
    May 28, 2004
    Messages:
    38,771
    Location:
    Ireland
    Ratings:
    +34,113
    If the system isn't aimed at Russia, why doesn't Shrub take up their offer to use Azerbaijan instead?
  21. Paladin

    Paladin Overjoyed Man of Liberty

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    50,154
    Location:
    Spacetime
    Ratings:
    +53,512
    Stationing one of our most advanced systems inside former U.S.S.R. territory seems a little unsound given the recent posturings of the Russian President.

    I'd say: why doesn't Putin take up the offer to allow Russian personnel at the Czech and Polish sites?
    • Agree Agree x 1
  22. Dan Leach

    Dan Leach Climbing Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    32,367
    Location:
    Lancaster UK
    Ratings:
    +10,677
    Its all a bunch of chest thumping bullshit posturing from all sides, absolutely pathetic.
    Most experts dont think the missile sheild will be worth shit even if it gets built.
    If the sheild does get built then the only missiles that will be launched within its vicinity will be ones that cant be knocked out by a missile sheild....

    Its about politics, it all has fuckall to do with knocking missiles out of the sky
  23. marathon

    marathon Calm Down, Europe...

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    28,685
    Location:
    Midamerica
    Ratings:
    +3,593
    I pretty much agree with that assessment.

    But again, even if it's as worthless a system as Dan says, it's still upon Poland and the Czech Republic to make a decision, not England Dan (or John Ford Coley for that matter), about what goes on within the borders of their national sovereignty. If they want them, they should have them. Anyone who doesn't like it...well that's what NATO is for :soma:
    • Agree Agree x 3
  24. Chris

    Chris Cosmic Horror

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2004
    Messages:
    28,946
    Ratings:
    +4,331
    When you demonstrate a rudimentary knowledge of this topic, then you can speak.

    Until then, shut your stupid, fucking craw.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  25. Chuck

    Chuck Go Giants!

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2004
    Messages:
    17,931
    Location:
    Tea Party shithole
    Ratings:
    +8,887
  26. Dan Leach

    Dan Leach Climbing Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    32,367
    Location:
    Lancaster UK
    Ratings:
    +10,677
    Uhh i could say the same of you, you silly turd.
    I have not seen one single expert on military matters who thinks a missile shield would be of any actual use whatsoever...
    ...have you?
  27. Chris

    Chris Cosmic Horror

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2004
    Messages:
    28,946
    Ratings:
    +4,331
    Of course I have.

    Look at what our Patriot system did during the Gulf War! That was just theater defense, but with the proper funding, we should have a strategic asset to counter singular ICBMs from despots and the like. And the Russians still have theirs. Upgraded and uprated, so they obviously believe it's good for something.

    But I digress. Marathon is right, and honestly, I'd rather not spend my money protecting Europe at all. We should aim on constructing this system in Japan for our own protection.
  28. Dan Leach

    Dan Leach Climbing Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    32,367
    Location:
    Lancaster UK
    Ratings:
    +10,677
    This is concerning the Alaskan missile shield, but the technology is the same
    ...and...
    http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0513-02.htm

    The missile shield has NOTHING to do with knocking missiles out of the sky. Its about global politics, point scoring and what cards you can lay on the table during diplomacy. It's the same crap governments are always up to...
  29. Chris

    Chris Cosmic Horror

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2004
    Messages:
    28,946
    Ratings:
    +4,331
    Exactly. If it doesn't work now, then it'll never work and we should obviously quit trying. :rolleyes:
  30. marathon

    marathon Calm Down, Europe...

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    28,685
    Location:
    Midamerica
    Ratings:
    +3,593
    Any idea or experiment that doesn't succeed on the first attempt should be abandoned forever :soma:
    • Agree Agree x 2