Will We Get Fordlandia, Jonestown, or Galt’s Gulch Out of This?

"No you!"

Fuck's sake, you sad little man.

I'm amused and tall, actually.
Unless you're Shaq sized. Doubt it.
Plus Shaq is pretty mellow.
Be like Shaq.

Junior thinks he can upset me.

See? Not mellow.
Christ, even deadly venomous snakes take a nice nap in the sun sometimes.

which part is the strawman?

that you've bleated free ass in the past or that you aspire to being miserable and alone?


and darling, you're the reason I look clever.

You presuming to characterize what I want.

That anything I might "aspire" to would resemble the vanity project of a bunch of tech bro douchebags. You don't know that. You can't support it with direct statements of mine. You choose to assume it.

And don't call me darling, you greasy little twatwaffle.

Aww.

*Nose boop*

Sure, muffin.

I will accept "muffin."

We know.

Keep you paws off my muffin.

Uncle Albert lives on Drury Lane confirmed

whatever, snooky.
you're gonna tell the class that you haven't harped about free association (and thus the right to exclude) as being sacred?

Of course I have.

But nothing else you said follows from that, no matter how desperately you wish it.

I literally repeated myself twice after you threw out the strawman hail mary.
Just because you're incapable of following that...

But hey, what's a bit more dishonesty? It's what we expect of you.

Repeating your lies will not make them true. I am not responsible for the fantasies you choose to believe.

except I repeated something that you agreed with the first time then called a lie the next two times.

put on the fucking respirator at work! you're somehow getting dumber.

Idiot. Fucking slack-jawed mongoloid motherfucker. It is absolutely fucking appalling that you have any influence over the care of other human beings with your advanced level of cognitive decline.

Yes, I obviously favor free association as an overriding social policy.

NO, it does not follow from there that I would have any regard for some tech bro vanity project community on the ocean.

First, because if I have functionally unlimited means, the LAST goddamn thing I'm going to do is deliberately subject myself to MORE people in my living situation.

Second, because living on the ocean leaves you far too vulnerable to both natural and man-made dangers I would never choose a floating fortress.

If both of those facts weren't already patently obvious to you, you have no goddamn business commenting on my values OR motivations.

Spaceturkey's harmless free speech has left UA completely unaffected.

Get back to me when I try to blame him for some drastic action I take.

Aw, just hmyeehh? No rar-rar-rarr!?
Tch. Rats.

you've also in the past, used the notion of free association as grounds to exclude.
which is what I was alluding to and what everyone here save for you seemed to grasp.

I'd hasten to add that it seems well established that you have neither values nor motivations thus nobody cares about your super genius preparation plans for a fortress of solitude.

So NOW your story is something about exclusion. Right.

You care enough to fucking lie about it, asshat.

California Tech Billionaires Will Get a Vote on Their Planned Utopia