Are you not aware we can read what you write? Maybe all of this is some strange misunderstanding because you do not know that when you hit post reply all the stuff you wrote in the box becomes visible to everyone else? Maybe you are that stupid? Anyway, the gig is up and the cat is out of the bag. We read what you have been writing and you are clearly a part of cult 45.
The actual news shows on Fox are still actual news. They aren’t OAN. It is just that their prime time lineup is horrible and that’s all most people watch. The company has argued in court that the public knows that their prime time lineup is entertainment and not news and so they have no obligation to stick to the truth. Of course those are the shows he watches. Their news shows are slanted right but they are at least news. The fact that he isn’t even willing to listen to them says so much.
This is related to the NYT is gonna push Joe is old until he sits down for an interview with them story. Low information voters generally WANT to be low information. It is a choice. For them facts are like vegetables. You gotta sauce them up and sneak them in. Which is why Biden is sitting down with Howard Stern and not the NYT which has the Times just completely incensed. 99.9993% of the folks who read the NYT know who they are voting for in the fall. Half of Stern’s audience doesn’t even know there is an election. Those are the folks that are gettable.
That’s true. You didn’t say you wouldn’t watch them. In fact you haven’t said anything. You have however conspicuously ignored my post and the subsequent seven bumps. http://wordforge.net/index.php?posts/3534151/ Here’s a link as it was two pages back. You’re welcome.
The answer is no I will not subject myself to propaganda for a week. By the way, I often listen National Panhandler Radio's broadcast of the Sunday shows in my car on my way home from work and I listen to Washington Journal on my way to work every Sunday. I also often watch The Five which does have news and sometimes Outnumbered. You and Dickhead just assume that I don't diversify my news because all you ever do is make assumptions about people that conforms to your preconceived bias' you have against certain people. Then you use the lame excuse of, "I'm just going off of your posting history." If that's true then you have a very bad memory and a bad interpretation of my posts.
...while nothing is said about Trump's gold shoes, and Pureflix using crowdfunding, and every Youtube yahoo having a Patreon. Funny how that works.
Why would I say anything about Trump's golden shoes? You want me to get worked up over that? Pureflix? What's wrong with having a Patreon?
I know you've never had a job, but some people do their Youtube shows because they want to turn their hobby into a full time job because they're miserable in their cubicles. In order to do that, they get a Patreon so that people who like their content can support their channel. I know that's a tough concept for you, but most of us have to work for a living and don't want to work at a job we hate. Who gives a shit if Trump wants to sell shoes to the idiots who buy them? You still haven't explained what Pureflix is and why I should care.
Setting aside the Washington Journal bit (did you mean Washington Post or Wall Street Journal? - either way I REALLY believe you are regular reader/listener) why do you think that the Economist, the Financial Times and Fox News are propagandists and who do you think they are propagandizing for?
Washington Journal is a news show on C-SPAN that often has guests and they have a call in line for viewers/ listeners and mostly calls balls and strikes.The Economist may not be so much. I don't know much about the Financial Times. Fox News is obviously propaganda for the RNC. You know who I regularly get my news from, Reason, The Hill and Breaking Points, none of which is rage bait.
Like a PBS/NPR telethon. Scale doesn't alter the principle. You just said what I said. Just with a bunch of UA grandstanding horseshit tacked on. God, you two are knuckleheads. How do you stand yourselves?
sweetheart, you post youtubers who have 10's to hundreds of thousands of subscribers just like you... with those numbers they ARE mainstream. And that's not even considering the media form itself, which is also the new "mainstream". the greatest difference is that "alternative" (about as alternative as Good Charlotte, maybe) tends to be less verified than legacy news media, and is instead often little more than the same inaccuracies being repeated. Maybe you oughta give up trying to use that particular pejorative, as it's become meaningless.
why do you never post those things here? WTF? You can't just claim that you read those things and then all you show is is Joe Rogan and popular CHUDS and that makes the lies correct. OMG you are stupid. Thgis is why you suck. It is not that you are stupid, but that you think everyone else has to be as stupid as you.
Oh fine..... *Opens an incognito tab so the YT algorithm doesn't send me down the Nazi rabbit hole* *Pastes the video in* *Starts the video* Auughh!! No. The guest-host guy sounds like the punchable great-uncle at every gathering who sucks all the joy out of the air at a quantum electron level with his fat fucking mouth. I couldn't even make it. Gah!
I actually watched it because it wasn't actually Jimmy Door knob. All they did was point out that the audience was probably coached to say 4 more years rather than Biden, and Biden flubbed the whole thing. I do not think they are wrong, but from what I could bother watching they did not seem to understand Biden has to focus on a lot more due to his stutter problem, and that does mean he will just read directly and not process other cues from the teleprompter because he is trying to control his stutter. So the geniuses actually figured out Biden has a speech problem. This is what happens when you half think something. That is what CHUDs do because they have half the fucking brain function of a functioning human being.
It leaves out the fact Biden has a speech iumpediment, and that makers it very hard to read while speaking. Unlike most of us Biden has to concentrate much more on saying the words he reads as he reads them. That is something we all know about him Jr. You and Not Jimmy Dore finally figured out Joe has trouble speaking at times, especially while reading. We know this. As a Joe Biden hater, I actually think it is greast that he has come so far to be able to speak like this in times when his mental capacities are at the extreme and that makes the stutter all the worse. But we all knew that for decades now, and we know that having a stutter does not make one stupid. What makes one stupid is being @Steal Your Face .
making a mountain out of a mole hill that's not really in question. as I said, it's editorializing, and barely worthy of that. Annoying as they can get, at least someone like David Pakham or Brian Cohen will have a bit more source material to work from. now contrast to any of the other guy's senile rambles to understand why a Biden blooper is hardly notable, let alone scorn worthy. Once you're done, consider that the whole "leadership of the free world) is boiling down to who is less along the dementia spectrum... your turn now, same length.
You'd think that a prophet would be able to foretell that he was going to get his ass sued for $1 billion and lose, but apparently not.
I gave tucker too much credit. I cannot believe I gave him too much credit. I really thought he was a racist who was just in it for the money. I did not realize he was full on alex jones fundie crazy.
His brand of crazy is seeing a buck in ratcheting up the crazy to the bitter death. If choking anti-matter Lazarus would make Mario coins fall from the sky, he'd fucking do it.