What makes you think I'm not Andy's puppet master, working in league with the time traveling Martians?
The Washington Post fact checker checked the claims she made on Fox News Sunday, where she said the FBI found that she'd been honest. They gave it Four Pinochios.
Because your TechForge and Media Central posts tend to be of good quality, but almost all of your Red Room posts are utter banality.
Julian Assange says And from Breitbart: PHILADELPHIA – The National Security Agency (NSA) has “all” of Hillary Clinton’s deleted emails and the FBI could gain access to them if they so desired, William Binney, a former highly placed NSA official, declared in a radio interview broadcast on Sunday. Speaking as an analyst, Binney raised the possibility that the hack of the Democratic National Committee’s server was done not by Russia but by a disgruntled U.S. intelligence worker concerned about Clinton’s compromise of national security secrets via her personal email use. As I've said, Hillary is too corrupt to allow her to continue into office. Our national security apparatus has to respond. Perhaps they are.
Her involvement with the Russians is no better than how she funneled weapons to ISIS. Latest connection Report: Hillary Clinton’s Campaign Mgr John Podesta Sat on Board of Company that Bagged $35 Million from Putin-Connected Russian Govt Fund That mess is long and complicated. As part of her "Russian reset" Hillary got a bunch of US tech firms, including Google, to set up partnerships with a Russian initiative that the CIA and DoD eventually determined was just a way to funnel advanced US technology into Putin's new arms buildup, developing such things as the new Russian hypersonic nuclear missile to aim at the United States and Europe. Of course the Clinton Foundation got tens of millions in donations from the Russians and various Putin cronies, as did Clinton insiders like Podesta, while the Putin got a re-energized defense sector and the world got a very dangerous Russian resurgence. Basically, Hillary created most of the threats facing the West, in return for cash to line her own pockets and feed her own unlimited ambition.
They don't even try to hide the bias and double standards. Might as well say Hillary wore white because she's an angel and Melania wore white because she's in the KKK.
The media that gave Chris Stevens mother's speech one minute of major network coverage and Khan's father's speech 55 minutes of major network coverage - even though the speeches should have equal weight.
ITV news (uk) just reporting a Republican congressman has broken ranks, said enough is enough and he will be voting Hillary. The US based reporter suggesting the tide is turning on Donald. Agenda bias or is this happening??
Surprised to see a Republican endorse Clinton over the more obvious alternative in Johnson. A quick glance over his career shows him to be a rather liberal Republican however. Edit: In 2012 he even suggested women should donate money to Democrats because they represent women better than his own party does.
There has been a flood of Republican endorsements over the past week, though mostly lower level pols, former pols, or unelected activists. I suspect this won't be the last Congressman, though.
Sitting, but retiring next year. So has nothing to lose and can say he is walking away with a clear conscience. Until a sitting and going to be in office next year (meaning could suffer electoral or committee retribution) politician has the guts to come out against Trump, I don't think we'll see any kind of real wave.