First Chuck Schumer, now Tom Harkin has come out about how convoluted Obamacare is. It just gets better and better. http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/225812-harkin-dems-better-off-without-obamacare
Of course it's convoluted. The Heritage Foundation drew it up that way. Oh and I thought you'd have enough of this place.
And yet 12 million more Americans have health insurance than did this time last year. @Federal Farmer will now link to any single piece of legislation passed in the past century that isn't convoluted.
That's right garamet, shrug it off like you always do because you wish to remain willfully ignorant and of course. You usual,
She's shrugging it off because we've already explained in excruciating detail that the PPACA was based on the work of a libertarian think tank, the Heritage Foundation (not Hermitage), and was quite popular with conservative Republicans, right up until the time it was proposed by a moderate Democrat.
@Federal Farmer will now do a point-by-point comparison of this: Assuring Affordable Health Care for All Americans with the PPACA and show how they differ.
It's already true, so the number of times I repeat it is irrelevant. The managing editor of Think Progress bragged "Obamacare premiums DECREASED in at least 14 states in 2015." I'll leave you to your Hillary love. Yeah, Bill should totally have those people jailed or deported.
Meanwhile, in the world outside the Echo Chamber: Arkansas, Kentucky Report Sharpest Drops in Uninsured Rate
A large percentage of people's premiums dropped and an even larger had their effective out of pocket costs went way down with the subsidies. You are just factually wrong. Also, yearly price increases are now at their lowest rate in half a century. Fact.
Yup. On top of health care spending increases being at the lowest level in a very long time, total health care spending as a percentage of GDP was flat over the last year. That's a big fucking deal that means the growth of health care costs is actually sustainable now. That isn't to say we shouldn't try to reduce or contain those costs even more, but it means that we no longer face a crisis of health care costs. Again, that's a big fucking deal.
So I wondered how garamet would react to Gruber's admission bragging about having deliberately played the American people for suckers. And she reacted exactly as I thought she would.
You guys didn't overlap. I was wondering what you'd say about Garamet's response to the irrelevant Gruber stuff. Your post is just as I expected.
Has it caused any of the 12 million Americans who now have health insurance to lose that health insurance? No? Then