ISIS thread

Discussion in 'The Red Room' started by gturner, Oct 14, 2014.

  1. Dan Leach

    Dan Leach Climbing Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    32,366
    Location:
    Lancaster UK
    Ratings:
    +10,668
    Chemical battlefield munitions and rusting shells are not 'WMD'.
    • Agree Agree x 2
  2. gturner

    gturner Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2014
    Messages:
    19,572
    Ratings:
    +3,648
    That's sort of a value judgment. One Sarin shell in New York is WMD. A thousand rotting in the desert are not.
  3. Liet

    Liet Dr. of Horribleness, Ph.D.

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2008
    Messages:
    15,570
    Location:
    Evil League of Evil Boardroom
    Ratings:
    +11,723
    Who said anything about sarin, dipshit?
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. gturner

    gturner Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2014
    Messages:
    19,572
    Ratings:
    +3,648
    We found Sarin shells in Iraq. One was even used as an IED that made two US soldiers slightly ill. Fortunately the binary shell didn't mix well.
  5. Lanzman

    Lanzman Vast, Cool and Unsympathetic Formerly Important

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Messages:
    35,178
    Location:
    Someplace high and cold
    Ratings:
    +36,671
    The UN disagrees. Chemical weapons are in fact defined as weapons of mass destruction by international treaty.
  6. Dan Leach

    Dan Leach Climbing Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    32,366
    Location:
    Lancaster UK
    Ratings:
    +10,668
    Well, from the pre-war quote I posted above
    We allowed and supplied Iraq with chemical and biological munitions during the Iran Iraq war, some of them where alwyas going to be left over.
    Thats not what the US and the UK where trying to sell us before the Iraq invasion though. They were trying to paint Saddam as an imminent threat capable of unleashing WMD's. Not exactly a lie,... but certainly bullshit.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. Steal Your Face

    Steal Your Face Anti-Federalist

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2013
    Messages:
    47,772
    Ratings:
    +31,763
    How many people have to die to be classified as a mass of people? WMD is such a faulty term.
  8. gturner

    gturner Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2014
    Messages:
    19,572
    Ratings:
    +3,648
    Yep. It started getting thrown around as a catch phrase and the term came to encompass everything other than a knife or personal firearm. By domestic law enforcement definitions, WMD is anything from a mortar to a grenade to a 2-liter Diet Coke and Mentos - along with hydrogen bombs and weaponized Ebola.

    In diplomacy the term meant something more like "nuclear weapons or their tactical or strategic equivalent." Chemical weapons can fit the bill, but only if you have fairly large quantities of them.
  9. Dinner

    Dinner 2012 & 2014 Master Prognosticator

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2009
    Messages:
    37,536
    Location:
    Land of fruit & nuts.
    Ratings:
    +19,361
    Not a single person has died of chemical weapons in Iraq since 1988. The question isn't how many have to die but why are you completely barking mad and making up shit?
  10. Steal Your Face

    Steal Your Face Anti-Federalist

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2013
    Messages:
    47,772
    Ratings:
    +31,763
    So mustard gas and serin gas can't kill thousands of people? Tell that to the Kurds.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. gul

    gul Revolting Beer Drinker Administrator Formerly Important

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2004
    Messages:
    52,375
    Location:
    Boston
    Ratings:
    +42,367
    So you understand, then, why Federal Farmer is full of shit?
    • Agree Agree x 1
  12. Ancalagon

    Ancalagon Scalawag Administrator Formerly Important

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    51,572
    Location:
    Downtown
    Ratings:
    +58,200
    Both you and @gturner really need to stop lying. WMD was never found in Iraq and as I pointed out already (and you admitted to) we NEVER supplied Iraq with chemical and biological munitions. We sold them equipment that could be used to manufacture chemical weapons but which also could be used for producing all sorts of things.
  13. Steal Your Face

    Steal Your Face Anti-Federalist

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2013
    Messages:
    47,772
    Ratings:
    +31,763
    You think the military didn't know exactly what they'd be used for?
  14. gturner

    gturner Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2014
    Messages:
    19,572
    Ratings:
    +3,648
    Well, if we didn't find WMD in Iraq, we sure found a lot of chemical munitions.
  15. Steal Your Face

    Steal Your Face Anti-Federalist

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2013
    Messages:
    47,772
    Ratings:
    +31,763
    Which can be made into a weapon that could kills lots of people. Hence a WMD.
  16. Ancalagon

    Ancalagon Scalawag Administrator Formerly Important

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    51,572
    Location:
    Downtown
    Ratings:
    +58,200
    No we didn't, we found a couple small mortar and artillery rounds with some degraded chlorine gas in them. They had been buried and forgotten for 20 years. In no way were they WMD or any danger to the US.
    • Agree Agree x 2
  17. gturner

    gturner Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2014
    Messages:
    19,572
    Ratings:
    +3,648
    We didn't find a couple, we apparently found at least 5,000.
  18. gturner

    gturner Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2014
    Messages:
    19,572
    Ratings:
    +3,648
    Hrm... Who is funding ISIS and keeping them supplied with food and medicine? It turns out we are.
  19. Ancalagon

    Ancalagon Scalawag Administrator Formerly Important

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    51,572
    Location:
    Downtown
    Ratings:
    +58,200
    Close! Only two orders of magnitude off (which for you is pretty close).

    From the Iraq Survey Group's Final Report, Annex F:

    A total of 53 munitions have been recovered, all of which appear to have been part of pre-1991 Gulf war stocks based on their physical condition and residual components.

    http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/l...nal-report/isg-final-report_vol3_cw-anx-f.htm
    • Agree Agree x 1
  20. gturner

    gturner Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2014
    Messages:
    19,572
    Ratings:
    +3,648
    Then why is the New York Times saying we found 5,000, and why did the Pentagon in 2006 admit we found 500, and why is Annex F labeled "Chemical Munitions —Other Finds"
  21. Ancalagon

    Ancalagon Scalawag Administrator Formerly Important

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    51,572
    Location:
    Downtown
    Ratings:
    +58,200
    It's labeled "Other Finds" b/c the job of the Iraq Survey Group was to locate and secure Iraq's WMD. After three years of searching (with 1400 DoD and CIA staff) the final report stated that Iraq DID NOT HAVE WMD. Let me say that again. After 3 years of searching the county with over 1400 Department of Defense and Central Intelligence Agency staff, staff whose sole job was to find WMD, no WMD was found. No evidence that Saddam had a WMD program was found. None. Zero. Zilch. Nada.

    However, there were some 'other finds' ('other' as in NOT WMD) including 53 rusted out and degraded CW munitions that had been buried in the desert for 20 years.
    Last edited: Oct 20, 2014
    • Agree Agree x 1
  22. Steal Your Face

    Steal Your Face Anti-Federalist

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2013
    Messages:
    47,772
    Ratings:
    +31,763
    If you pay attention to the Bush rationale, you'll notice that it wasn't just about the WMD's that were supposedly were devoloping, but were suposedly being developed and / or had alread y been there since the 80s.
  23. gturner

    gturner Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2014
    Messages:
    19,572
    Ratings:
    +3,648
    So if chemical munitions weren't WMD, why were we looking for chemical munitions?
  24. Ancalagon

    Ancalagon Scalawag Administrator Formerly Important

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    51,572
    Location:
    Downtown
    Ratings:
    +58,200
    And if you read the damn report (or just read about the report) you would know that NO WMD WERE FOUND, either old or new. NO WMD PROGRAMS were found. Iraq had not had active Nuke or CW programs after 1991 and no active biological warfare program after 1995. All known* stockpiles were destroyed in the 1990s.

    I'll say it again, according the Department of Defense and Central Intelligence Agency Iraq had no WMD and no WMD programs.
    http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/report/2004/isg-final-report/

    Read the damn report. Seriously. Read the god damn report. It's all in there.

    *As in known to the Iraqis! They thought they had destroyed everything. Those 53 mortar and artillery rounds were lost and buried out in the desert.
    Last edited: Oct 20, 2014
  25. Ancalagon

    Ancalagon Scalawag Administrator Formerly Important

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    51,572
    Location:
    Downtown
    Ratings:
    +58,200
    God damn you're a moron. As explained to you already all CBRN ARE NOT necessarily WMD. WMD stands for Weapons of MASS Destruction. A mortar round with some degraded chlorine gas that has been rotting in the desert for 20 years IS NOT WMD.
  26. Zombie

    Zombie dead and loving it

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    45,044
    Ratings:
    +33,117
    You can never win anything like this with air-power alone.

    If American air-power was backed up by serious fire power on the ground by the Iraqi army we wouldn't have a problem. However the Iraqi army can not be trusted. Too often they are more interested in throwing down their weapons and running.

    There must be troops on the ground to root out ISIS.
  27. Ancalagon

    Ancalagon Scalawag Administrator Formerly Important

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    51,572
    Location:
    Downtown
    Ratings:
    +58,200
    Supposedly the young Shia officers (sectarian appointees) that fled have been replaced by veteran (read Saddam era Sunni) officers and are having some success.

    The formation of a true coalition government this week should help as well. Also they are talking about bringing back the Iraqi National Guard which will be a help.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  28. Dinner

    Dinner 2012 & 2014 Master Prognosticator

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2009
    Messages:
    37,536
    Location:
    Land of fruit & nuts.
    Ratings:
    +19,361
    Frontline had an excellent special recently about losing Iraq. Maleki seems to have made every decision based upon sectarian thinking firing every experienced person and replacing them with lacky yesmen who were part of his sectarian group. Is it any wonder the government barely functioned in the best of times and that the army was completely useless?
    • Agree Agree x 1
  29. gturner

    gturner Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2014
    Messages:
    19,572
    Ratings:
    +3,648
    My Iraqi neighbors would agree with that. A couple of days after Obama removed the last of our forces, Maliki accused his Sunni vice president of treason and murder and ran him off into Kurdistan.

    One bump we might hit is that in places like Abu Ghraib, interviews with the Sunnis say that they deeply resent the depredations of the Shia militias that have just shown up to defend Baghdad, and that if 100 ISIS fighters show up they will become a thousand because so many Sunnis will join them to strike back at the Shias.
  30. tafkats

    tafkats scream not working because space make deaf Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Messages:
    25,003
    Location:
    Sunnydale
    Ratings:
    +51,389
    Suddenly this thread makes a lot more sense. It turns out that "There were WMDs in Iraq after all!" is part of the most recent set of Lunatic Fringe marching orders.

    • Agree Agree x 1