Okay buffoon, what is significant to Trump being elected? Do you even know which contention you are referring to?
He was pointing out how saying a minority (racist Trump supporters) of a minority (Trump supporters in general) of a group (Americans) is racist, is not the same as calling all Americans racist trump supporters.
No. You can't understand a basic conversation yet you expect us to believe you can be President and are a competent teacher. Here's a tip. You want to challenge something, read and and understand what is said first.
So an atheist has no right to criticize a religion? Even if they've been a victim of it. Interesting take.
No. You called her a Muslim reformer, remember? The very name describes a Muslim who wants reform, which is exactly what Nawaaz is. He is no atheist. So why compare an apple to an orange? Perhaps you can explain to me why I am called a Muslim lover and apologist every day I post here while being an atheist and never a Muslim, but she's a "Muslim reformer" for having the same standpoint as me and originally being a Muslim? I think you know the answer.
They can't use religious objections against it and criticize it that way. For example in my opinion a non Muslim has no right to say "Muslims shouldn't do this because the Prophet said not to"
It is significant that he was able to defeat a massively better funded, organized, and widely endorsed and supported opponent (seemingly by most elements of the intelligentsia) despite running an at most half assed campaign. if the Democrats can't beat Donald Trump they can't beat anyone.
A non believer has the right to criticise any religion. Aside from the fact that they are ficttional, man created ideas.....let's suppose for a second they weren't. Let's say the belief in the Muslim, Jewish, Christian god is real. "He" exists - what stops a non-believer criticising it?
Your response in no way addresses what I said, what @Man Afraid of his Shoes pointed out to you or what is being discussed in this thread. Come on, admit it, you're not really a teacher are you? No teacher would be this obtuse.
You like to pretend you're just dumb and folksy, but we all know you're a barely closeted deplorable. I prescribe drinking bleach.
We're discussing the SPLC. It's not all about you dude. Your implication is that it's fine that Ali was put on their list. Semantic point? Maybe. But you could diffuse it with a single sentence.
which was debunked, but thanks for reporting some more Fake News because lord knows we didn't get enough this year
Expost ergo propter hauc bull shit and you know it. Oh, and a greay many have been debunked as hoaxes, not that the truth matters to you with your seven degrees of Kevin Bacon idiocy.
