More Star Wars Than You Can Handle

Discussion in 'Media Central' started by Black Dove, Apr 19, 2013.

  1. Black Dove

    Black Dove Mildly Offensive

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Messages:
    17,421
    Location:
    Northern New Jersey
    Ratings:
    +6,756
    FTFY.

    As long as the studio takes the franchise seriously and hires top talent the way that Marvel has handled their films. I actually have confidence in Kathleen Kennedy to run Lucasfilm and steer the franchise in the right direction. She and her husband Frank Marshall worked with Spielberg for years and she knows her stuff.

    Just remember that Marvel has had its hits and misses, too. For every Iron Man. Captain America an The Avengers they've also had Iron Man 2, and two Hulks. Not terrible movies by any means, but not up to the other films. Still, overall the Marvel franchise is going strong and making consistently entertaining movies. While chances are we may get a stinker every now and then, especially if they are releasing a new film every year, still I think we will get more good fims than not.
  2. RickDeckard

    RickDeckard Socialist

    Joined:
    May 28, 2004
    Messages:
    37,919
    Location:
    Ireland
    Ratings:
    +32,532
    It was inevitable, I suppose. But what a load of shit it is nonetheless.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. Rimjob Bob

    Rimjob Bob Classy Fellow

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,782
    Location:
    Communist Utopia
    Ratings:
    +18,679
    Did you happen to catch The Princess and the Frog?
  4. Amaris

    Amaris Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    I liked The Princess and the Frog.
    I didn't like Cars 2. That is the first Disney/Pixar movie I actually do not like. At all.
  5. NAHTMMM

    NAHTMMM Perpetually sondering

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    14,719
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Ratings:
    +9,949
    Sounds like Famous Last Words to me. :lol:

    Disney may pull off a string of not-terrible films for Star Wars, but that doesn't mean the *cultured voice* discerning movie-goer will want to see them all. Disney is entirely capable of settling on a formula that seems to work and running with it. After three or four movies/trilogies of the Wacky Sidekick + Darth Maul knock-off + Death Star knock-off shtick, you may very well be announcing your intention to catch any more Star Wars movies on DVD. I don't anticipate that happening, if they're going to run several sub-series at once, but it's possible.
    Last edited: Apr 20, 2013
  6. Diacanu

    Diacanu Comicmike. Writer

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    101,613
    Ratings:
    +82,708
    The novels already ran that formula into the ground.

    And...even though I bailed on them in the late 90's, there's still a loyal audience for them.
    :shrug:

    We shall see...
  7. Tuckerfan

    Tuckerfan BMF

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    77,698
    Location:
    Can't tell you, 'cause I'm undercover!
    Ratings:
    +156,674
    The thing to pay attention to is if Disney brings back its Hollywood Pictures division. The slogan that folks in the industry attached to the division was, "If its the sphinx, it stinks!" since so many of the movies released by them were duds.
  8. Shirogayne

    Shirogayne Gay™ Formerly Important

    Joined:
    May 17, 2005
    Messages:
    42,385
    Location:
    San Diego
    Ratings:
    +56,143
    Damn, George Lucas has got to be the biggest hack in Hollywood history. Someone told me that he had originally wanted Episode One's storyline to be the first one he filmed back in '75 or whenever IV was filmed, and I thought she was full of shit. But from everything I've heard since, that would be the only idea of his that wasn't completely full of fail

    He's a great visionary, but he really needed to turn the reigns over a long ass time ago. :jayzus:
  9. Shirogayne

    Shirogayne Gay™ Formerly Important

    Joined:
    May 17, 2005
    Messages:
    42,385
    Location:
    San Diego
    Ratings:
    +56,143
    This will probably be the second.

    This was originally supposed to be a direct-to-DVD release, which tells me everything I need to know about this film. :jayzus: That, and someone in Pixar needs to get fired, and soon.
  10. shootER

    shootER Insubordinate...and churlish Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Messages:
    49,459
    Location:
    The Steam Pipe Trunk Distribution Venue
    Ratings:
    +51,216

    Link
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. Dayton Kitchens

    Dayton Kitchens Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2004
    Messages:
    51,920
    Location:
    Norphlet, Arkansas
    Ratings:
    +5,412
    I remember back in the late 1980s, there were questions in an entertainment magazine about when Lucas would produce the "other two trilogies" of Star Wars movies.

    At that time, it was said that Lucas was badly burned out with Star Wars and really DID NOT WANT to bother with more Star Wars for various reasons. It was even said that he was disturbed by the criticism of "Return of the Jedi" which he considered the superior film of the three and that he did not like how the director of "The Empire Strikes Back" was given so much of the credit for that movies quality.
  12. Black Dove

    Black Dove Mildly Offensive

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Messages:
    17,421
    Location:
    Northern New Jersey
    Ratings:
    +6,756
    Lucas was NEVER a great visionary. He was a mediocre film maker who just happened to make one movie that it hit right note with audiences at the right time. But even that film was anything but original, having borrowed everything from other movies and old series

    His original script for Star Wars: The Adventures of Luke Starkiller was a godawful, convoluted piece of shit that was such a mess it was completely unfilmable. The studio forced him to break it down to a smaller story. And even during filming Gary Kurtz would reign in his stupid ideas. I think the lower budget and having to answer to someone else helped Lucas make a better movie. But Lucas is totally unable to make a decent film on his own with no one to answer to. He's not nearly talented enough.
    • Agree Agree x 3
  13. Mr. Plow

    Mr. Plow Fuck Y'all

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2004
    Messages:
    4,137
    Location:
    Langley Falls, VA
    Ratings:
    +1,409
    Yes, but enough about American Graffiti, this thread is about Star Wars.
  14. Dayton Kitchens

    Dayton Kitchens Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2004
    Messages:
    51,920
    Location:
    Norphlet, Arkansas
    Ratings:
    +5,412
    Even the timing and the things about Star Wars "inventing" the "Summer Blockbuster" are false.

    "Jaws" had already made the summer blockbuster with cool special effects (and little story) the thing that studios wanted to pull off.

    One of the biggest things to impress me about the first Star Wars movie is how Lucas actually managed to pay so many good actors so little money....
  15. Black Dove

    Black Dove Mildly Offensive

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Messages:
    17,421
    Location:
    Northern New Jersey
    Ratings:
    +6,756
    It's called a "low-budget film". They still make them all the time. Most great actors prefer doing the smaller budget, independent films because they are usually much better written, and they get a chance to really act. Then they'll do the "blockbusters" to make a big paycheck so they can go back and continue to make smaller films. Stars like George Clooney and Bruce Willis have made dozens of smaller films that are more for actor showcasing than they are to make money.

    As for Lucas, the only two great actors he got for Star Wars were Alec Guinness and Peter Cushing, both of whom fully understood they were making a small movie (since no one ever thought Star Wars would become the phenomenon it was). Everyone else were unknown actors who really weren't that good. Hell, I wouldn't even call Harrison Ford a good actor. He's okay, but nothing special.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  16. Diacanu

    Diacanu Comicmike. Writer

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    101,613
    Ratings:
    +82,708
  17. Dayton Kitchens

    Dayton Kitchens Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2004
    Messages:
    51,920
    Location:
    Norphlet, Arkansas
    Ratings:
    +5,412
  18. Tuckerfan

    Tuckerfan BMF

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    77,698
    Location:
    Can't tell you, 'cause I'm undercover!
    Ratings:
    +156,674
    Uh, huh, and I think we all know what the expression on Hamill's face was when he got the call asking him to be in the new movie. :obamanomics:
  19. Black Dove

    Black Dove Mildly Offensive

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Messages:
    17,421
    Location:
    Northern New Jersey
    Ratings:
    +6,756
    I seem to remember all the "old" jokes tossed around by the media during the first couple of Star Trek movies, too. So don't knock it.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  20. Black Dove

    Black Dove Mildly Offensive

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Messages:
    17,421
    Location:
    Northern New Jersey
    Ratings:
    +6,756
    Here's some information from Hamill that is making me quite excited about the new Star Wars film.

    From Aint It Cool News:


    Please God, I sincerely hope that is the direction they go for the new films. More practical sets and creatures, and less CGI porn.

    That's one of the things I've always liked about Peter Jackson's LOTR films is how they merge CGI with good old-fashioned model work and practical SFX.
    • Agree Agree x 3
  21. El Chup

    El Chup Fuck Trump Deceased Member Git

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Messages:
    42,875
    Ratings:
    +27,833
    ^ You can bet than he'll still be lining up for his paycheque even if it's a CG fest.