Reactionary Radical Eliminationists vs. Trans

Ted's alibi is pretty tight, so no.

that'd depend which of the assorted criminal behaviors or addictions you've made up about me I was responding to...

and shit... we've got almost 20 years here of you being a shitty excuse for a human to choose from. copsucker, low key racist, scab/temp- I remember using "Boxer" a few times, but one went right by your semi literate self...

so you get someone wet, they can beat you to death?

at least you'll never die at a woman's hands.

So you admit you've got nothing but word salad from an addled brain.

Mmm, yes, shallow and pedantic.

I can only work with the material you provide /shrug

Nothing to see here. Move along, you hateful bigots.

https://www.newsweek.com/planet-fitness-faces-boycott-calls-outraged-conservatives-1880134

ooh, look... he found a bad cherry to pick.

dude, everyone acknowledges there are dishonest opportunists out there. I'm not sure why this is any more significant than any other creep in your poor wee brain?

The existence of opportunists means terrorize a whole minority into the closet forever and ever.
It's the only way to be sure.
Its how we solved all the problems, and utopia commenced immediately.

If trans women are "unbeatable" in female sports, how did 8 cis women just beat a trans athlete, blocking her from the NCAA Championship final? In the lowest-division D3?

Sadie Schreiner is a trans athlete in D3 track and field - Outsports

This just proves what I’ve been saying all along. Men don’t need an excuse to assault women. One thing I learned very young is that people can say anything they want, but just saying it, doesn’t make it the truth. Dude can say he identifies as a woman all he wants, but women, trans or cis, do not have a need to show off their dick.

Nah no need to move along, this sounds like the case of a dickhead who deserves what they have coming.

Let's linger here and let you revel in your victory, what exactly do you think this has proved?

Possibly because he shouldn't have been allowed in there to begin with? Nah.

I will appreciate this brand new "no cherrypicking" policy, though.

Clown World rules are in effect. 99.99% of the population must accept shit like this so that .01% can feel "affirmed."

Next: Some strained, bullshit Rosa Parks comparison.

That Nova is flat fucking wrong to insist it never happens and should not be a concern, for starters.

'zactly... HE shouldn't have

actual trans women who if they haven't had surgery and are prolly doing their damnedest to hide it, otoh...

you may now commence with protests that I'm nuancing between apples and anvils.

And I'm sure you'll appreciate the "brand new policy" withthe same intelligence and honesty you always have...

imagine that, a gross underestimation
0.1-0.6%

https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/trans-adults-united-states/
https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/trans-population-by-country

the Pew suggests up to 5%

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-r...s-different-from-their-sex-assigned-at-birth/

350M people in the US alone...

so about 1.75M- 17.5M Americans identifying as Trans/NB.

How do ya like those cherries?

Junk inspections are oppression, you bigot.

Self-reporting bullshit, subject to no consistent standard of verification.

And why is the exact figure for that miniscule percentage necessary anyway? It doesn't exactly undermine any particular point.

So, did UA pull his number out of his own ass, or Critical Drinker's?
Or was it some Human Centipede process?

Call it "most" versus "a tiny fraction" if the specific number is giving you pendants fits. It changes nothing.

Well, it doesn't change you; you can't fix stupid.

I guess I am not quite getting what happened here.

It seems that tghis public owned place has decided to let pre-op trans women into their locker room. The locker room is where you change clothing and perhaps shower meaning their genitals will be exposed, and that means you will see a penis iof the person still has one. I am missing where this is exposing themselves to someone. You do not walk into a nudist camp and then get angry because someone exposed themselves to you.

Really,. sounds pretty simple that if seeing a penis bothers you then you need to not use a changing room where a penis might be according to the policy of the privately owned company. Did this trans person go up to this prude and rub their pre-op genitals in her face? That would be wrong for any cis female to do with their vagina. If that operson was just doing the same old thing in the changing room as any woman, then that is not exposure. If you do not like seeing genitals, then do not look.

Seeing a penis is not assault on your eyes. This idea that just seeing a penis is assault is stupid and unrealistic. People who think that need to be smacked. I would say we need to arrest UA for exposing people to his penis as an infant when he popped out of the jackal that birthed him, but I do not think it was large enough to be seen with the naked eye. Lucky him.

Baby Joey on "All In The Family" assaulted me.
My soul has died.

All I know is the next time I see a trupanzee in the rest room pissing in a urinal and exposing himself to me I am having him arrested and accusing libs of tik tok for it. If we reallyu want to go down this absurd crazy that if you see a dick you have been assaulted, then let us take it to the end and arrest Donald Trump for being a giant orange penis walking around in public exposing himself to everyone.

Critical Drinker is a movie critic. I’m not going to defend him, he’s definitely a misogynist. But, he has fuck all to do with trans. I believe you might be thinking of Joe Rogan.

so who gets to decide who is and isn't genuinely trans? you?
last I checked, people were the authorities on defining themselves...

yeah, several million is a "miniscule" figure when stated next to "0.01%". Especially when that 0.01 is a number you pulled out of your ass that is actually ten to fifty times that... but I guess it's easier for you to dismiss the right to exist of smaller sounding groups.

ya know what group made up less than 1% of a population in the 1930s?

I thought it was a tiny orange mushroom penis?

Every time you make up numbers much smaller than they actually are it undermines the strength of your argument since it shows you've either done zero research before starting to mash the keyboard, or are lying.

What is your preferred policy in Albertopia?

Let's say a totally passing and ripped trans man shows up at the desk and you're in charge. Are you sending him into the women's change room, or just denying him admittance entirely?

The argument is stupider than that.

99.9999999 percent of people need to accept @Uncle Albert doing anything he does. If UA wears pants all of those people have to accept it, like he has to accept if I wear a skirt. It is part of the general social contract that we all accept another person's existence and allow them to bne who they are as long as it does not involve harming others.

The rest is manners, and if you want to run around calling men ladies because you are the real slim shady, then people are going to treat you like the edgelord ass you are so you better start making money on it. If I walk down the street and see a UA type pretending to be a masculine tough guy in his Jeep, long ass stupid beard, and whatever other cosplay of a man he has on, there is nothing for me to do but laugh and snicker.

Guess what, no one arrests anyone who decides to laugh and snicker at me. No one does it for any of us. If I laugh and snicker because I see Stephen Segal in public, he might come over to me and try to fight me, and I might get my ass kicked, but no one is going to arrest me for laughing at hjim, or UA for that matter.

The only penalties there might be for treating a trans person rudely as long as you do not break the law and assault or harass them, is you might get soime verbal backlash, or you might get fired from your job if your employer does not want an asshole representing them. No police come by and say you have to treat a trans person like the gender they represent. You just have to not stop them, just like I am not allowed to take UA's jeep away and shave his beard and tell him he cannot pretend to be a man until he is a man in my eyes.

No one is getting special rights, and if UA thinks me going out as a woman is cosplay, then so is him going out as a man, and we are both allowed to do so.