I would say it needs a fifth panel where he goes "Oh yeah?" and tries to pin her for rape, then a sixth where she deploys the mace. But let's not kid ourselves that Fuentes and his ilk are that confident in their own perceived ability to overpower women. Nah, he'd try spiking her drink. And be too fucking obvious about it.
Why? Because if people knew who you were you might not say stupid shit? Some of us don't find our opinions so shameful we'd be embarrassed if people knew we said it. Kind of like it's easy, for instance, for @Volpone to threaten to shoot me. Which is easy to do when he can hide behind a keyboard.
Nick Fuentes wants to be doxxed. The idea that doxxing him is the same as doxxing UA is stupid. Nick wants controversy and makes money if people show up to his house protesting. He works for himself and he monetizes stuff like that. Doxxing someone from WF works out different because we might lose our job, or we might suffer other damages from people harassing us IRL. Doxxing Nick Fuentes = what he wants and good for him. Doxxing some loser welder in Nebraska = Petty and a waste of time.
Because it is always done by people who either retain THEIR anonymity, or are otherwise shielded from consequences. Also, "SWATting" should be considered attempted murder. By all means, avail yourself and I will happily tell you to your face what a massive twat you are.