The Colin Kaepernick Thread

*Trombone version of "how dry I am"*

So, I take it, you still can't explain your nonsense from earlier? You know, where I said people were free to not support speech they did not like and where you wrongly imagined Anita serkadian some how proved that wrong.

Oh, that's easy. I can't stand Krauts, Wops, Dagos (or is that the same thing as a Wop), Bohunks, Spics, Frogs, Bay Frogs (French Canadians), Pollocks, Crumpet stuffers (Brits), Bjorks, Bog jumpers (Irish), Balts, Pohms (Australians and New Zealanders - Prisoners of His Majesty), Fish-eaters (Norwegians), Grease balls, Gomers, Goobers, Haggistanis (Scots), Hosers, Ruskies, or Windmill Winders (Dutch).

Isn't everyone else free to call you an idiot?

That used to have a lot more neg reps, although it was not the single most neg ripped post in Wordforge history. That one was Dinner's

So what would MJ be then? 'Bloke'? Isn't that British and Aussie slang for guy friend?

Please learn the difference between nationality and race before you claim someone is racist. Then you won't look stupid by misusing words.

Is Scotland a nation or are the cross-dressing, deep-fried Mars bar eating, +4 handicap Haggistanis a race?

If they would keep their dick out of the warp core maybe it wouldn't almost breach so damn much.

Now I, too, can remember the day when @Dinner made @TheLonelySquire seem well-adjusted and reasonable. His cheese truly has slid off his lily white cracker.

I can remember when you were regarded as well adjusted and reasonable. That was what, a decade ago?

Thankfully I have no such reputation, because I don't indulge the moral preening of people still voting for the party of race based human slavery who are desperate to engage in an orgy of virtue signaling.

Yes, your reputation is one of a purveyor of lies, spin, irrational partisanship and desperately unfunny "jokes".

What a great reputation to have!

Yes it is, especially when the denizens try to come up with evidence of a lie. Those threads are hilarious. The last one had them supporting Mussolini the KKK, and Woodrow Wilson. I think they've given up on repeating those and seem to hope that newbies don't notice and take the claims at face value.

Nevertheless, they'll cast their votes for a corrupt witch who destroyed the lives of rape victims to protect her husband, who is an impeached serial rapist, because she rakes in billions of dollars from big oil, fracking, Muslim dictatorships, and Russian defense contractors, all of whom hacked her e-mail server and can blackmail her, at least during the six hours a day that she's awake.

He truly is the whitest person here.

He's probably got a lot of pride about that as well.

umm, no.

Try again...

No, race is a stupid thing to be proud of. I concentrate on achievements as that is something a person can take personal pride in.

So why bring Spanos' Greek ethnicity into it at all?

You can split hairs over race and ethnicity but the bigotry you display consistently is still ugly no matter what label you place on it.

I've been saying from the beginning that he's more of a bigot than a racist because of his hatred of people who don't share his whitebread, San Diego Chamber of Commerce view of the world.

Skin color doesn't matter.

I think skin colour, along with various other factors, matters to him when the object of fear has traits of difference he can latch on to.

Rattle off 5 of your black heroes.

Martin Luther King, Rosa Parks, Thurgood Marshall, Harriet Tubman, and Jackie Robinson.

Now, name five native Americans you admire.

Whoever coach Calipari has on the floor.

Sitting Bull, Sequoyah, Sacagawea, Montezuma, Tecumseh.

Why admire Montezuma? He didn't do much other than get captured, duped, and then killed. Hell, I would have included Manco Inca before him because that guy at least lead a rebellion and innovated new tactics to fight the Spanish even if he lost.

But his revenge is famous.

True, Montezuma failed and was therefore a filthy animal no doubt.

He didn't start it but the whole human sacrifice and ritual cannibalism thing was rather uncivilized and the world is better off without it. Besides Montezuma wasn't even ruler for very long before the Spanish showed up, duped him, and then killed him.

As for failing, I just mentioned Manco Inca failed but he truly did give tge Spanish a run for their money and innovated new war tactics like killing the Spanish horses then picking off the dismounted knights. Not to mention independently inventing guerilla warfare and even trying to train and equip native unitz with Spanish weapons and tactics. So despite ultimately losing a decade later he really did accomplish something.